eepstein0 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:BostonCollege1 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:According to the other site you have multiple guys on that chart that have been expelled from BC so you’ll have plenty of open spots.
Off-field fights and on-field brawls, a lot of character individuals Hafley is recruiting.
Where are you seeing this?
winged lion on the island of misfit toys
It's over on EagleInsider. Google is your friend.
I also witnessed the brawl, sucker-punching and (allegedly) spitting on opposing players.
The team clearly has zero respect for Hafley.
EagleInsider seems like it has a chance to not suck now that they brought AJ Black over.
As for players and Hafley... I disagree with "no respect for Hafley" comment. I think the players really like him. What is there not to like. Players loved Jags and Henning as well. I think the issue is that they are still kids who need structure and a bit of pushing to be successful. I think many different styles can be successful in coaching. Being a hard-ass clearly works (too many examples to name)... being an aloof CEO also works... as does the BFF model. But, in each case, you need to offset the personality of the head coach to provide balance (good cop/bad cop). So, if you have a tyrant, you need to have softer assistants who will nurture the players along. If you are an aloof CEO, you need assistants who are hands on. And, if you are a Love'em Hard coach, you need assistants who are going to hold the kids accountable. I think Hafley is learning this all too late.
As for the Cuse game, I think a whole lot of it was coming from Cuse. And the fight at the end of the game was all due to the idiots from the tundra trying to plant a flag. If the players just walked away and let them do it, you would be on here talking about how the players are an embarrassment to the school and have no pride for letting that happen. I'm proud that they stood up for themselves after the game.
In his first season, I said that Hafley's tenure had the feel of Coughlin (with a lot of folks focused on what he could do). When he failed to take the next step (and actually regressed), I said that his tenure had the feel of what Jags in Year 3 would have been. It was recently pointed out that, what Hafley's tenure is MOST similar to is Henning's. Sadly, that may be correct. Jeff will get a year to see if he'll ever be a head coach again. But, it will require him to make foundational changes to his vision for a staff.