EagleOutsider.com

Three Local Women To Appear In Latest Playboy Issue
Posted by Erica Bustamante
September 4, 2009

090908_playboy_girls2Now that football season and school is back in session, three local women will be featured in Playboy’s October college issue.

The magazine, on newsstands September 11, will feature “Girls of the ACC”. Last spring Playboy photographers visited ACC universities to audition women to appear in the nude pictorial.

The local co-eds that will be appearing in the magazine are Stephanie Christine from UNC-Chapel Hill, Candice Maria from Duke and Ashley Nicole from NC State.

A news release from Playboy states that the company’s radio morning show will make a few surprise stops at campuses along the way.

Other schools appearing in the magazine include Maryland, Miami, Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech, Clemson, Florida State, Wake Forest and Virginia

[url]
http://entertainment.myncblogs.com/2009 ... boy-issue/[/url]

I blame this on TRE.

I mean WTF was he doing?

TRE, you are worthless.

You have 490,985 pics of nakid BC girls and not one made it into Playboy?

Disgustiad..

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:that would make bc the only non-participant.



actually, i don't know if that's good or bad?!?!?

yeah sure try and blame it on us?

You big loser.

What happened to the girl with the open heart panties and garters and nylons?

You brought shame to BC!

I think we should give TRE probation,

Who wouldn't want to see Issues in Playboy? Ban TRE.

DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Who wouldn't want to see Issues in Playboy? Ban TRE.

Me. trust me.

So the question is, were our girls not hot enough, too prude, or just overlooked?

Surely BC has better offerings than these three.

http://durhamcounty.mync.com/site/durhamcounty/news|Sports|Lifestyles/story/41304/three-local-women-to-appear-in-latest-playboy-issue.

1-2-3

DougBushBC {l Wrote}:So the question is, were our girls not hot enough, too prude, or just overlooked?

That's my vote. The girls who liked to get naked (as I remember it) were not necessarily the ones you wanted to see naked...

DougBushBC {l Wrote}:So the question is, were our girls not hot enough, too prude, or just overlooked?

How many times did I tell you to never post my picture!!

AdamBC {l Wrote}:

DougBushBC {l Wrote}:So the question is, were our girls not hot enough, too prude, or just overlooked?

That's my vote. The girls who liked to get naked (as I remember it) were not necessarily the ones you wanted to see naked...

I tend to agree, although there were plenty that you could get drunk enough to get naked that were fine fine fine, but that was only after 20 dollar drafts at the kells!

DougBushBC {l Wrote}:

AdamBC {l Wrote}:

DougBushBC {l Wrote}:So the question is, were our girls not hot enough, too prude, or just overlooked?

That's my vote. The girls who liked to get naked (as I remember it) were not necessarily the ones you wanted to see naked...

I tend to agree, although there were plenty that you could get drunk enough to get naked that were fine fine fine, but that was only after 20 dollar drafts at the kells!

Something tells me that Playboy doesn't want to be that kind of magazine.

The AVP girls ... tem gorgeous... wow!

AdamBC {l Wrote}:

DougBushBC {l Wrote}:

AdamBC {l Wrote}:

DougBushBC {l Wrote}:So the question is, were our girls not hot enough, too prude, or just overlooked?

That's my vote. The girls who liked to get naked (as I remember it) were not necessarily the ones you wanted to see naked...

I tend to agree, although there were plenty that you could get drunk enough to get naked that were fine fine fine, but that was only after 20 dollar drafts at the kells!

Something tells me that Playboy doesn't want to be that kind of magazine.

Its pretty sad that they couldnt get one Slutty BC girl. Maybe the one that had the incident with QP would come back around!