EagleOutsider.com

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

eagle33 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:The real question is who will be in our division in the SEC after they invite us because Lukabu led us to 2 national championships after Hafley left us because he had already won 2 championships also?

good question. i think we actually end up in the big 10 east division after the power brokers in the sec and big 10 decide how to divvy up the acc teams worth inviting for membership.

that's where your argument falls apart. neither conference needs another vandy / northwestern

PhillyandBCEagles {l Wrote}:The other thing if it turns into an absolute free for all, you could see wealthy backers turn their teams into powerhouses virtually overnight. Think Oregon (already a T10-15 program but could become dominant), Maryland, etc but really it could happen for any school--only takes one billionaire tech bro who actually cares about his alma mater's team to turn Stanford into a baby rapist, etc.

eagle33 {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

eagle33 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:The real question is who will be in our division in the SEC after they invite us because Lukabu led us to 2 national championships after Hafley left us because he had already won 2 championships also?

good question. i think we actually end up in the big 10 east division after the power brokers in the sec and big 10 decide how to divvy up the acc teams worth inviting for membership.

that's where your argument falls apart. neither conference needs another vandy / northwestern

we're not getting left behind when conference restructuring happens.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Thinking BC doesn't matter is dumber than ticket revenue. It is all about the televisions and streaming devices to the shot callers, who don't know the casual fan in the region isn't watching.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Thinking BC doesn't matter is dumber than ticket revenue. It is all about the televisions and streaming devices to the shot callers, who don't know the casual fan in the region isn't watching.

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Thinking BC doesn't matter is dumber than ticket revenue. It is all about the televisions and streaming devices to the shot callers, who don't know the casual fan in the region isn't watching.

you don't think the shot callers have ways to go back and see that only eleventeen devices logged into the ocho to watch spaz shit and piss himself and then lip readably curse at anyone he could blame for his wet and smelly pants

Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:There was a pretty solid takedown of this report by a couple of lawyers on Twitter this morning. The way the ACC contract is structured their really is no way for Florida State and Clemson to jump ship before 2036 and those arguing that ESPN will somehow apply pressure on Phillips and the rest of the conference to abandon rights it has against FSU and Clemson are obviously unfamiliar with tortious interference with contract. Disney has some pretty deep pockets and such a claim could result in a verdict north of $150 million for each member school of the ACC against ESPN and its parent. And this isn’t speculation from a couple of Internet lawyers, it’s a takedown utilizing an internal ESPN memo from its general counsel warning against ESPN “participating in any way in discussions concerning conference alignment.”

With respect to Ohio State and Michigan, while media reports that the grant of rights runs through 2027, the cost of exiting is actually larger than the payment of an ACC-like putative exit fee. In addition to the exit fee during the agreement, at renewal of the grant of rights in 2027, any member school deciding to not renew the grant of rights must pay the other members of the BIG 10 a sum equal to 15 years of television fees from the previous contract. That is a staggering amount of money and is apparently why tOSU’s threats to exit the BIG 10 last fall when the BIG 10 decided not to play, were, according to sources within the tOSU Administration and Athletic Department, “completely empty.”

The SEC move to create a Super Conference that could presumably quadruple its current TV rights package is being done because of something previously discussed. To wit, the SEC lacks the funds to engage in a NIL arms race with certain northern and coastal schools that have much deeper pockets then their alumni bases. The Oklahoma maneuver makes sense as they are in the exact same boat as the SEC. The Texas move is curious and if you read news reports this morning, their are apparently a bunch of Texas alums who are so unhappy with this potential surrender of their vast resource advantages to Alabama, Auburn, etc. that the Texas State legislature has a bill in both the House and Senate ready to go when the fleabagging Democrat scum return to the state in the next couple of days, forbidding UT from changing conferences without the approval of the Texas legislature and Governor.

The way all of this is being presented as fait accompli by a bunch of football writer boobs is stupid, but unsurprising.

CowboyEagle22 {l Wrote}:

Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:There was a pretty solid takedown of this report by a couple of lawyers on Twitter this morning. The way the ACC contract is structured their really is no way for Florida State and Clemson to jump ship before 2036 and those arguing that ESPN will somehow apply pressure on Phillips and the rest of the conference to abandon rights it has against FSU and Clemson are obviously unfamiliar with tortious interference with contract. Disney has some pretty deep pockets and such a claim could result in a verdict north of $150 million for each member school of the ACC against ESPN and its parent. And this isn’t speculation from a couple of Internet lawyers, it’s a takedown utilizing an internal ESPN memo from its general counsel warning against ESPN “participating in any way in discussions concerning conference alignment.”

With respect to Ohio State and Michigan, while media reports that the grant of rights runs through 2027, the cost of exiting is actually larger than the payment of an ACC-like putative exit fee. In addition to the exit fee during the agreement, at renewal of the grant of rights in 2027, any member school deciding to not renew the grant of rights must pay the other members of the BIG 10 a sum equal to 15 years of television fees from the previous contract. That is a staggering amount of money and is apparently why tOSU’s threats to exit the BIG 10 last fall when the BIG 10 decided not to play, were, according to sources within the tOSU Administration and Athletic Department, “completely empty.”

The SEC move to create a Super Conference that could presumably quadruple its current TV rights package is being done because of something previously discussed. To wit, the SEC lacks the funds to engage in a NIL arms race with certain northern and coastal schools that have much deeper pockets then their alumni bases. The Oklahoma maneuver makes sense as they are in the exact same boat as the SEC. The Texas move is curious and if you read news reports this morning, their are apparently a bunch of Texas alums who are so unhappy with this potential surrender of their vast resource advantages to Alabama, Auburn, etc. that the Texas State legislature has a bill in both the House and Senate ready to go when the fleabagging Democrat scum return to the state in the next couple of days, forbidding UT from changing conferences without the approval of the Texas legislature and Governor.

The way all of this is being presented as fait accompli by a bunch of football writer boobs is stupid, but unsurprising.

This theory may get a test. Looks like the B12 thinks they have evidence that ESPN has been something other than a disinterested bystander.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... onference/

HJS {l Wrote}:

CowboyEagle22 {l Wrote}:

Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:There was a pretty solid takedown of this report by a couple of lawyers on Twitter this morning. The way the ACC contract is structured their really is no way for Florida State and Clemson to jump ship before 2036 and those arguing that ESPN will somehow apply pressure on Phillips and the rest of the conference to abandon rights it has against FSU and Clemson are obviously unfamiliar with tortious interference with contract. Disney has some pretty deep pockets and such a claim could result in a verdict north of $150 million for each member school of the ACC against ESPN and its parent. And this isn’t speculation from a couple of Internet lawyers, it’s a takedown utilizing an internal ESPN memo from its general counsel warning against ESPN “participating in any way in discussions concerning conference alignment.”

With respect to Ohio State and Michigan, while media reports that the grant of rights runs through 2027, the cost of exiting is actually larger than the payment of an ACC-like putative exit fee. In addition to the exit fee during the agreement, at renewal of the grant of rights in 2027, any member school deciding to not renew the grant of rights must pay the other members of the BIG 10 a sum equal to 15 years of television fees from the previous contract. That is a staggering amount of money and is apparently why tOSU’s threats to exit the BIG 10 last fall when the BIG 10 decided not to play, were, according to sources within the tOSU Administration and Athletic Department, “completely empty.”

The SEC move to create a Super Conference that could presumably quadruple its current TV rights package is being done because of something previously discussed. To wit, the SEC lacks the funds to engage in a NIL arms race with certain northern and coastal schools that have much deeper pockets then their alumni bases. The Oklahoma maneuver makes sense as they are in the exact same boat as the SEC. The Texas move is curious and if you read news reports this morning, their are apparently a bunch of Texas alums who are so unhappy with this potential surrender of their vast resource advantages to Alabama, Auburn, etc. that the Texas State legislature has a bill in both the House and Senate ready to go when the fleabagging Democrat scum return to the state in the next couple of days, forbidding UT from changing conferences without the approval of the Texas legislature and Governor.

The way all of this is being presented as fait accompli by a bunch of football writer boobs is stupid, but unsurprising.

This theory may get a test. Looks like the B12 thinks they have evidence that ESPN has been something other than a disinterested bystander.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... onference/

It only gets tested by inducing the BREACH of the contract. Thus far, all discussions have been about planning for when the contracts expire. ESPN, conferences and B12 members are all free to work with whomever they want regarding the future beyond 7/1/2025.

eagle33 {l Wrote}:greasy gene is quoted in this thamel realignment story.

https://sports.yahoo.com/big-12-commish-bob-bowlsby-takes-aim-at-espn-bellowing-a-distrust-schools-have-for-network-054741624.html

The second important takeaway was that by sending the letter, Bowlsby in many ways helped galvanize the league. He identified clear enemies in ESPN and the departing schools. Bowlsby only sent that letter with presidential support, which means this will end up bonding the eight schools remaining in the Big 12. And part of that is due to the distrust of Texas and Oklahoma.

HJS {l Wrote}:It is entirely possible that one (or four) of the schools who were approached by the horribly named AAC followed through with their contractual obligation. Bowlsby absolutely does not need the support of anyone to send such a letter. In fact, Dennis Dodd (who's generally an asshole) is saying that the AAC's plan is to absorb ALL remaining B12 teams (and hopefully changing the name to something like the Big America Conference).

eagle33 {l Wrote}:

HJS {l Wrote}:It is entirely possible that one (or four) of the schools who were approached by the horribly named AAC followed through with their contractual obligation. Bowlsby absolutely does not need the support of anyone to send such a letter. In fact, Dennis Dodd (who's generally an asshole) is saying that the AAC's plan is to absorb ALL remaining B12 teams (and hopefully changing the name to something like the Big America Conference).

the Big Awful would be a good name for that conference.

Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:You definitely need critical mass and a national footprint to compete against the NFL. You also need good product to draw viewers. Merging the current P5 into the P2 gives you critical mass and a national footprint. With 4 divisions of 8 teams each in the two conferences old rivals are kept and put back together. Texas to the SEC gets the Texas v Texas A & M game back.

Unfortunately, the SEC and the B1G will decide how many and which schools get an invite. This is a huge year for BC football.

Go Eagles!

eagle33 {l Wrote}:Which college football programs are the most valuable in conference realignment?

https://medium.com/run-it-back-with-zach/which-college-football-programs-are-the-most-valuable-in-conference-realignment-b8e840f42189

HJS {l Wrote}:Conference Expansion talk is always uses words like "keeping up" and "counteract" and "response" and "strike first". These are all words of failed jocks who view inter-program relationships adversarially. To do something on the scale that is being tasked (i.e. turn college football into a professional league) requires coordination and centralized leadership. It is like ceding the creation of the European Union to call-in talk show hosts.

There has to be global buy-in on a set of rules. Given their position post-Texas, the SEC would be smart to lead the creation of this next step and do so in a manner where they cede some of their market power. While they could opt to create a "super-league" of 24 teams (which somehow include the non-competitive dregs of their current conference), doing so will ultimately result in their irrelevance. They are best served by having diverse engagement from 64-80 programs. In that scenario, they will have the opportunity to receive a sizable chunk of the larger pie (30% of 100% as opposed to 100% of a pie reduced by 75%).

Until business leaders take the reigns from the academics and jocks, you will see hysteria and nonsense pervade.

TontoKowalski {l Wrote}:

HJS {l Wrote}:Conference Expansion talk is always uses words like "keeping up" and "counteract" and "response" and "strike first". These are all words of failed jocks who view inter-program relationships adversarially. To do something on the scale that is being tasked (i.e. turn college football into a professional league) requires coordination and centralized leadership. It is like ceding the creation of the European Union to call-in talk show hosts.

There has to be global buy-in on a set of rules. Given their position post-Texas, the SEC would be smart to lead the creation of this next step and do so in a manner where they cede some of their market power. While they could opt to create a "super-league" of 24 teams (which somehow include the non-competitive dregs of their current conference), doing so will ultimately result in their irrelevance. They are best served by having diverse engagement from 64-80 programs. In that scenario, they will have the opportunity to receive a sizable chunk of the larger pie (30% of 100% as opposed to 100% of a pie reduced by 75%).

Until business leaders take the reigns from the academics and jocks, you will see hysteria and nonsense pervade.

This is a good post and you should be proud of it. The other dumb jock false bias baked in is that realignment is zero-sum and static, ie, once you conduct the realignment then everything is "fixed" and "you have won".

There are always more kids than slots at the 'right' schools, and there are always coaches on the outside who want a shot, and these things will combine to create outsider programs that will put together a few seasons of competitive runs while the lesser of the in programs languishes by making TOBy-like risk-free decisions to preserve payouts.

Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:AJ Black is reporting a scheduling alliance between the ACC, B1G & PAC 12. Might be what gets ND into the ACC.

Go Eagles!

claver2010 {l Wrote}:so what does this alliance do? preset OOC games? or more extreme icing out the SEC?

i may be missing something but not sure why this is the level of news the media was hyping last night

HJS {l Wrote}:

Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:AJ Black is reporting a scheduling alliance between the ACC, B1G & PAC 12. Might be what gets ND into the ACC.

Go Eagles!

https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... scheduling

• North
• Cincinnati
• Kansas
• West Virginia
• Iowa
• K-State
• Iowa State
• South
• BYU
• Houston
• Central Florida
• Baylor
• Texas Tech
• Oklahoma State